Land Law and Equity Problem - Free Essay Example

LAND LAW AND EQUITY PROBLEM Co-ownership is where two or more people simultaneously enjoy the responsibilities and rights of owning a property. From first January 1926, there exist two manifestations of Co-ownership specifically joint tenancy and tenancy in common.[1] Joint tenancy exists where four co-owners simultaneously enjoy the responsibilities and rights of owning a property. According to the law, joint tenants are considered as one person who is possessing the entire property. This is to say that they have no distinct shares in the property. Therefore, none of them can dispose their individual interest in the property through a will if they pass away. However, they enjoy the right of survivorship which occurs if one of them dies and the surviving tenants assume the interest rights left behind by the deceased.[2] Tenancy in common exists where two or more co-owners each have a distinct share of a property. They can therefore, dispose of their share of the property throughout their lifetime or when they pass away. Furthermore, these distinct shares are only a percentage of the property and not physically separated, rather it is an undivided share. Consequently, they each have a right to possess the entire property since the share is not divided. Nevertheless, none of them can exclude another from a given part of the property.[3] Advice for their interest in the cottage First of all, the five are joint tenants since they declared to have held title in trust for themselves. Additionally, legal property is held on trust for each other only in joint tenancy[4]. The five now are joint tenants with only the first four being recognised as the legal co-owners of the cottage[5]. This is only so if the first four joint tenants are of full age and able to become trustees[6]. The reason being that for a valid joint tenancy, there must exist four trustees who hold title to the cottage under a single document. Therefore, in view of the law none of them can dispose of their share of the cottage in a will. This is because of the way joint tenancy is considered to be owned by a single entity not unless the joint tenancy is severed.[7] Uniquely, joint tenancy starts and ends on the same date for all of them. Therefore, in case one of them is deceased, the cottage will lawfully belong to the four surviving tenants through survivor-ship right. This happens as lon g as the joint tenancy was not severed before the tenantà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s death [8]. If the joint tenancy was severed before the death, then the tenant can transfer his/her share through a will or conveyance can be carried out as per the intestacy rules of the state[9]. Joint tenancy satisfies all the four unities namely possession, interest, time and title[10]. If any of the unities is broken then a tenancy in common exists instead[11]. Possession is where the co-owners are equally entitled to the whole property. This means that restriction must not exist on the property use by the co-owners. In addition, no physical property division to each joint tenants share can be there. In the case of the cottage joint tenancy, unity of possession is present. This is because the possession is entitled to all the five without exclusion of any one as a co-owner. Unity of title is present since they receive their interest in the cottage in a single document same time. The unity intere st of the five co-owners is initially present as they have identical interests before they start severing the joint tenancy. When they severe their interest starts changing duration as they start dropping out one after the other, they inhibit presence of unity of interest though their interest had been of the same manner. Therefore, the unity of interest is absent. Unity of time is absent. The co-owners title vest at the same time but the five receive their share under dissimilar conveyance. Having considered the four unities, the joint tenancy present at first is severed due to absence of unity of interest and unity of times. Severance of interest of joint tenancy of a legal estate to create a tenancy in common in land is prohibited by law. However, it does not affect the rights of a joint tenant to release his/her interest to fellow joint tenants. Consequently it does not affect the right or sever a joint tenancy in equity whether a property is vested in joint tenancy or not, so long as any tenant desiring to sever the joint tenancy in equity notified the other tenant in writing[12]. Unfortunately, the consequences of severing are irrevocable. Once one has severed his/her interest, the severing cannot be reversed In our facts, Dirk is about to sever his interest and this is allowed by law provided he notifies the other joint tenants through writing. He notifies them through writing, and his notification is left in the last known place of business as required and they fall into Shabazà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s hands.[13] How the Proceeds of sales would be divided if the cottage was sold As earlier stated, in Joint tenantsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ kind of ownership, they all have equal rights to the whole property and in case one of them dies, the cottage automatically passes to the surviving tenants through survivorship right. Therefore, Dirkà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s share of the cottage is passed to the surviving tenants namely Mitchell, Anisah and Shabaz. However, none can pass ownership of the cottage in their will. This is because joint tenants appear as an individual and thereby cannot have distinct shares in property.[14] We also know that they were registered initially as joint tenants and that they held title in trust for themselves as joint tenants. In Joint tenancy, they all have equal rights to the whole property and in case one of them dies, the cottage automatically passes to the surviving tenants through survivorship right. Correspondingly, a joint tenancy will happen in co-ownership as the lawful title of the joint tenants. Also, there is a title for the tena nts which is common via equity which represents a persons interest in the property. Now considering that some property transfer occurred from the time they purchased the cottage to the time they sold it, Elijahà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s interest shall go to Mitchell who bought his share. Therefore, Mitchell will have a share of 40% of the sales after summing up both his share and that which he bought from Elijah. Since in joint tenancy the ownership of all the tenants ends at once, as Mitchell gets his share, Anisah and Shabaz will both have their shares too. However, since Dirk died and left all his property to Anisah, according to the Land law no one can pass property ownership to another person with or without a will. Therefore, if the joint ownership over the cottage was completely a joint ownership solely by law, then she cannot legally possess Dirkà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s share of the sales of the property. But since in Equity they had unequal commitment to the price tag, Anisah can no w have Dirkà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s share of the property price tag since as a friend she is allowed to possess the deceased friendà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s property in monetary terms as in accordance with the rules intestacy. Thus, Anisah should have 50% and Shabaz 10% of the price tag. I) If the property was conveyed into their joint names but no reference to any trust was made in the conveyance In the event that an express announcement of trust is not made during procurement, the position is more entangled because when the passages at Land Registry record the responsibility for legitimate property they will not record useful interests. It can in this way be to a great degree hard to focus the share in the property that every person is qualified for if their individual shares are not recorded at the time of procurement[15]. Where a property is acquired in joint names and there is no express attestation of trust, the general supposition is that esteem takes after the law that the persons hold the property as joint tenants. In any case, taking after the late decisions in Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott, there is amazing powerlessness here of the law. In Stack v Dowden, the House of Lords had held that, in places which no express declaration of trust that has been made, the people will be endeavoured to be joint tenants and met all requirements for comparable shares in the property unless one individual can show that the property was wanted to be held in an unforeseen way. A broad mixed bag of parts can be considered to show this. Then again, it may be in unprecedented cases that a court will be impelled that the people arranged a choice that is unique in relation to proportionate shares[16]. In Jones v Kernott, the Supreme Court comprehensively took after the methodology in Stack v Dowden. They included that in the event that it could be demonstrated that the individuals had planned to hold the property in discrete shares, however that it was unrealistic to focus the extent of the shares they had expected to have each, then the court would need to choose what was reasonable in light of the entire course of managing between the gatherings in connection to the property.[17] In such cases, without any important agreements between the parties that show they proposed something else, their advantageous shares will mirror the measure of their c ommitments. A conveyance to a buyer of a lawful estate in land should overreach any impartial enthusiasm influencing that domain, whether he has recognize thereof, if the conveyance is made by trustees available to be purchased and the even-handed interest is at the date of the conveyance equipped for being overreached by such trustees under the procurements of subsection (2) of segment (2) section I and the statutory prerequisites regarding the instalment of capital cash emerging under a disposition upon trust available to be purchased are agreed to. Along these lines without a reference to any trust they will not be in any position to offer the cottage which is their property.[18] II) If Mitchell is adjudged bankrupt For the situation that Mitchell is pronounced bankrupt and he holds the cottage as a trustee when he is made bankrupt, then there will exist a few outcomes as takes after. The joint gainful tenure gets to be naturally severed since Mitchell is a helpful joint tenant. Any of Mitchells gainful enthusiasm for the trust on which the property is held, or in the returns of offer under such a trust, is a piece of his domain thus vests in the trustee in insolvency in understanding to segment 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and no points of interest of the vesting will be made[19]. Furthermore, no change exists in the lawful domain, which stays vested in the joint tenants including Mitchell. The lawful joint tenure cannot be separated (Segment 36(2) and (3) of the Law and Property Act 1925)[20]. The legitimate domain does not structure piece of the bankrupts home (segment 283(3) of the Insolvency Act 1986)[21]. No insolvency notice or restrictions will be entered on the register. On any a ir the joint tenants including Mitchell keep on being the persons who must execute the significant deed. Mitchell can apply for a Form J restriction to ensure that the cottage is not put disposition after his trustee receives the disposition written notice[22]. Additionally, if there does not exist an already registered Form A restriction in the ownership then Mitchell will be able to apply for one to be entered since the beneficial joint tenancy will have been severed by the bankruptcy[23]. A Form J or A restrictions will not keep the enrolment of a disposition to which segment 27 of the Law and Property Act 1925 (instalment of capital cash to no less than two trustees) applies, as in the accompanying sample. Mitchell held the property as beneficial joint inhabitant before the liquidation. Mitchells trustee in liquidation applies to enrol Form J and Form A restrictions. A man in compliance with common decency can buy the property or development cash on security of a lawful charge. They pull out as needed by Form J and follow Form A by acquiring a receipt for capital cash from alternate trustees. That individual takes free of the trustee to greatest advantage in the valuable investment once in the past partly owned by Mitchell. On account of the buy the transferee will be enlisted as the owner and the confinements drop; on account of the charge, it will be enrolled yet the restrictions will stay in the ownership register and Mitchell will be unable to protest the enlistment and will need to look to the enlisted owners to record for any net returns because Mitchell and the other joint tenants have the capacity to offer the property given any Form A or J restrictions is agreed to, the buyer is not influenced by the liquidation. Likewise they held the title in trust for themselves as joint tenants, it is viewed that they hold trust for Mitchell. They can make an intentional game plan as follows: In chance that the course of action contains a task o f Mitchells advantage or makes a trust for the chief then an application may be made for enrolment of a confinement in standard Form A, if it has not been selected in the register. In risk the purposeful strategy contains an errand of Mitchells profit, it is viewed as that the chief likewise applies for a restriction in standard Form II, since the trust investment will be claimed by the director and not by Mitchell. In the event that the investment is hung on trust by Mitchell for the leasers or charged to the director, it is viewed as that no manifestation of confinement, other than in Form A (if not effectively entered), can be sought unless all the enlisted owners agree to the restrictions. This is because the enthusiasm of the director or lenders will be subsidiary. While Mitchells advantage would give off an impression of being a privilege or claim in connection to an enlisted bequest (Section 42(1) (c) of the Land Registration Act 2002), the charge on or valuable interes t to his greatest advantage are one expelled from the enrolled property thus are viewed as not to be rights or claims inside segment 42(1) (c)[24]. Bibliography Bailii.org, Jones V Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) lt;https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2011/53.htmlgt; accessed 17 March 2015 Bailii.org, Stack V. Dowden (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 17 (25 April 2007) lt;https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2007/17.htmlgt; accessed 17 March 2015 Findlaw.co.uk, Joint Tenancy Vs Tenancy In Common Property Law (2014) lt;https://www.findlaw.co.uk/law/property/buying_property/500189.htmlgt; accessed 15 March 2015 Gov.uk, Joint Property Ownership GOV.UK (2015) lt;https://www.gov.uk/joint-property-ownership/overviewgt; accessed 15 March 2015 Gov.uk, Practice Guide 34: Personal Insolvency GOV.UK (2015) lt;https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personal-insolvency/practice-guide-34-personal-insolvencygt; accessed 16 March 2015 Inbrief.co.uk, Legal Interests and Equitable Interests Compared: Discretionary Nature of Equity (2015) lt;https://www.inbrief.co.uk/land-law/legal-and-equitable-interests.htmgt; accessed 16 March 2015 Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : Law of Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) lt;https://www.inbrief.co.uk/land-law/coownership-land-law.htmgt; accessed 16 March 2015 Jamesonlaw.co.uk, Contribution-Of-Equity (2015) lt;https://www.jamesonlaw.co.uk/propertylaw/contribution-of-equity.phpgt; accessed 16 March 2015 Lawsociety.org.uk, Joint Ownership The Law Society (2013) lt;https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/advice/practice-notes/joint-ownership/gt; accessed 14 March 2015 Legislation.gov.uk, Law of Property Act 1925 lt;https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/enactedgt; accessed 17 March 2015 [1] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [2] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [3] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [4] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [5] Legislation.gov.uk, Law Of Property Act 1925 section 34 [6] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [7] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [8] Gov.uk, Joint Property Ownership GOV.UK (2015) [9] Lawsociety.org.uk, Joint Ownership The Law Society (2013) [10] Findlaw.co.uk, Joint Tenancy Vs Tenancy in Common Property Law (2014) [11] Gov.uk, Joint Property Ownership GOV.UK (2015) [12] Legislation.gov.uk, Law of Property Act 1925 S ection 36 [13] Legislation.gov.uk, Law of Property Act 1925 Section 196 [14] Inbrief.co.uk, What Is Co-Ownership? : The Law of the Land When Does Co-Ownership Arise? (2015) [15] Lawsociety.org.uk, Joint Ownership The Law Society (2013) [16] Stack V. Dowden (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 17 (25 April 2007) [17] Jones V Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) [18] Legislation.gov.uk, Law of Property Act 1925 [19] Gov.uk, Practice Guide 34: Personal Insolvency GOV.UK (2015) [20] Legislation.gov.uk, Law of Property Act 1925 [21] Gov.uk, Practice Guide 34: Personal Insolvency GOV.UK (2015) [22] Gov.uk, Practice Guide 34: Personal Insolvency GOV.UK (2015) [23] Legislation.gov.uk, Law Of Property Act 1925 [24] Gov.uk, Practice Guide 34: Personal Insolvency GOV.UK (2015)

A Code Of Ethics And Its Impact On A Client s Mental Health

Counseling takes many different roads in the direction of improving a client’s mental health. These roads all lead to a common goal, but the therapist must be diligent in the direction chosen. A code of ethics provides the parameters for proper and effective treatment and boundaries protect the process of healing. Understanding how these two critical components interweave into this process aids in the conceptual framework of therapy. It may become necessary to expand upon and even cross the theoretical aspect of a boundary in order to stimulate the process of helping the client, but by no means shall these boundaries be violated. The Royal College of Psychologists (2013) compare professional boundaries to that of guardrails at the Grand Canyon, providing the visitor a safe area to enjoy the view with minimal risk of harm. Though the therapist’s boundaries can be much more flexible than a guardrail as it involves the process of therapy, some aspects such as sexual contac t as an example are just as unyielding. Utilization of ethical treatment keeps the counselor on the path with clear direction and out of harm’s way for both the client and the therapist. The substance abuse therapist must become intimately familiar with the definition and application appearance of boundary crossing versus boundary violation and how a code of ethics model successful treatment for the substance user. Though it is not uncommon for a substance abuse client to enter therapy with the perceptionShow MoreRelatedSocial Work Values And Ethics1441 Words   |  6 PagesValues and Ethics 1 Social Work Values and Ethics Unique to the Profession Jessica A. Rosario Arizona State University Social Work Values and Ethics 2 Abstract The history and evolution of social work dates to the late 1800’s. Since the profession was recognized many concerns arose regarding the values and ethics of social workers. The key points of the NASW Code of Ethics, the CSWERead MoreMental Health Care : Intentional Misdiagnosis Of Mental Disorders770 Words   |  4 PagesOverview of the Article Many mental health counselors work with managed care organizations (MCOs) to provide services to clients. While managed care guidelines determine how counselors deliver services and what they will be reimbursed for, many counselors are upset with how limiting the guidelines are. It is a challenge for counselors when insurance reimbursement is denied because the MCOs are not honoring DSM codes (Braun Cox, 2005). Therefore, counselors tend to submit inaccurate diagnoses thatRead MoreCoun 500 Personal Identity Paper1469 Words   |  6 PagesIdentity She’la S White Liberty University Abstract This paper will provide the reader with a reflection of my professional identity. This will focus on the role of a professional counselor and the differences between a professional counselor and other related professionals. It will also integrate how religious and spiritual beliefs can impact professional counseling. It will summarize my beliefs and values and what I plan to do so that I will not impose my beliefs on clients. Also, I willRead MoreCode Of Conduct For A Behavioral Health Center1586 Words   |  7 PagesCode of Conduct for a Behavioral Health Center Shaquita Jefferson MHA622: Health Care Ethics Law Judy Roberts Ethical Code of Conduct for a Behavioral Health Center Clear Mind behavioral health center provides a wide range of excellent counseling and mental health services by well trained, qualified and licensed professionals. Clear Mind has been in operation since 1988. We serve over 20,000 children, adolescents, adults, seniors and their families annually. Ethical issues are prevalentRead MoreEthical Dilemma in Psychology Today760 Words   |  3 Pagespsychology field especially in the mental health profession, strongly discourage therapist from engaging in any form of romantic relationships with former or current client. It is paramount because of the two most important encountered areas for these types of issues are termination and sexual relationships. It is not wise for a therapist to begin any form of social relationship with client after termination. The therapist has to politely and gentle inform the client that it is not a good idea for himRead MoreLegal Aspects of Professional Psychology1650 Words   |  7 PagesRelationship Mental health professionals are encountered with a widespread range of ethical and legal issues involving confidentiality in therapeutic relationships. Their practice often comes in contact with other disciplines, which can lead to struggles in upholding confidentiality. For example, in the criminal justice field, people wonder if mental health professional can preserve the confidentiality of inmate/patient information. There are other issues that suggest whether mental health professionalsRead MoreEthics : Ethical And Ethical Dilemmas1473 Words   |  6 Pages Ethics Help the Helper in Ethical Dilemmas Fred L. Slack University of the Rockies Abstract In ethical decision-making, there is an established way to address resolving ethical dilemmas systematically and following established decision-making steps to resolve ethical dilemmas effectively. Applied established ethical-decision making steps along with an understanding of established ethical codes is essential Here we will comprehensively discuss how a professional wouldRead MoreThe Ethics Code And New York State Professional Standards1580 Words   |  7 Pagesimprove their mental health circumstances. As a licensed professional psychologist, it will be easy to know who the client will be because the client will request a service, pay and consent form signed. Client cannot be easily defined as just a paying customer because a client encompasses so many other things. WHO IS THE CLIENT? Who is the Client? There should be an obvious answer, which will be the paying client. This paper will detail the outline of what it entails to be a client in the contextRead MoreEthics Code And New York State Professional Standards1471 Words   |  6 Pagestheir mental health circumstances. As a licensed professional psychologist, it will be easy to know who the client will because the client will request a service, pay and consent form signed. Client cannot be easily defined as just a paying customer because a client encompasses so many other things. WHO IS THE CLIENT? Who is the Client? There will be an obvious answer, which will be the paying client. This paper will detail what it entails to be a client in the context of the APA Ethics CodeRead MoreMental Health Practitioners: Roles and Responsibilities1770 Words   |  7 PagesAND ISSUES Mental Health Practitioners Mental health professionals or practitioners are categorized into 5 types, namely psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, psychiatric or mental health nurse, and licensed professional counselors (NAMI, 2012). The US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that there are more than 552,000 mental health professionals practicing today (Grohol, 2012). They focus on the treatment and/or diagnosis of metal health or substance abuse

Karl Marx And John Stuart Mill Essay - 1576 Words

Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill were both philosophers who lived in the 1800s. Beginning with Karl Marx, he was a German philosopher, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. In his adult years, Marx was not recognized as a citizen of any country even though he was born in Germany and he spent most of his years in London, England. There, he continued to evolve his philosophy and social thought in participation or collaboration with a German thinker called Friedrich Engels. They worked together and published different books; their most famous and familiar work is the 1848 booklet called The Communist Manifesto, which made an impact on political, intellectual, and economic history. Moving on to John Stuart Mill, he was an English philosopher, a bureaucrat, and a political economist. Not only that, Mill was one of the most prominent thinkers in the history of liberalism, and he participated in any event or anything in general that would help support and contribute to the political econom y, social theory, and political theory. Since Mill was a member of the Liberal Party and had very strong opinions and conceptions of liberty, he published one of his famous works called On Liberty, which describes Mill’s theory of moral values of utilitarianism and the foundation of the relationship between dominance and freedom. Furthermore, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill share very similar propositions or theories on how progression is feasible and that mankind plays the major role in operatingShow MoreRelated Comparing Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill Essay4553 Words   |  19 PagesKarl Marx was born and educated in Prussia, where he fell under the influence of Ludwig Feuerbach and other radical Hegelians. Although he shared Hegels belief in dialectical structure and historical inevitability, Marx held that the foundations of reality lay in the material base of economics rather than in the abstract thought of idealistic philosophy. He earned a doctorate at Jena in 1841, wr iting on the materialism and atheism of Greek atomists, then moved to Kà ¶ln, where he founded and editedRead MoreViews of Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill Essay examples1184 Words   |  5 Pageswith his private caprice. Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty While, after reading the above two quotations, it may appear that Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill take seemingly opposing views on the proper relationshipRead MoreThe Macroeconomic Perspectives of David Ricardo, Karl Marx, and John Stuart Mill2163 Words   |  9 PagesThe Macroeconomic Perspectives of David Ricardo, Karl Marx, and John Stuart Mill ECON 350 19 November 2012 Abstract The author surveys three influential economists of the Classical era—Ricardo, Marx, and John Stuart Mill—and introduces the reader to their Macroeconomic perspectives based on some of their more prominent Macroeconomic theories. David Ricardo David Ricardo was a Classical Economist who lived from 1772 to 1823. In his professional life he woreRead MoreFilling the Void: Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill and Others on Identity1145 Words   |  5 Pagesideologies. More specifically, new political movements, ideas of nationalism, and change of social norms brought on by many writers and theorists such as Karl Marx, John Mill, and many others. The spread of such ideas was also helped by the spread of public education and rising literacy rates in western society. The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is a short publication that contains Marx’s and Engel’s theories on the nature of society and politics, as well as class struggleRead More A Comparison of the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx1781 Words   |  8 Pageshunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same cloth, but in modern terms their community is referenced as a government, and they each have their own distinct opinions on the drive instilled within human nature that shape their personal economicRead MoreGovernment And Societal Ideas From The 19th Century1232 Words   |  5 PagesCentury, three prominent thinkers John Stuart Mill, Giuseppe Maz zini, and Karl Marx had their own ideas of an ideal society. These individuals had their own unique view of the perfect society. However, they all have something in common with their visions: all of these excerpts discussed an oppressive entity. In all of the three ideal societies concocted by these men, tyrannical governments or oppressive societies are obstacles to their visions. In the excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, he discussesRead MoreMarx, Mill And Freud s Critique Of Political Economy And The Communist Manifesto Essay1133 Words   |  5 Pagesmerely implicit) notions of freedom and unfreedom we find in the texts we have read by Marx, Mill and Freud. Use the esoteric traditions we have examined thus far (from the Book of Job to Plato) as a comparative yardstick, or point of reference, but without letting them take over the foreground in your paper -- the latter should be reserved for these three figures. Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and John Stuart Mill are three authors who tackle the topic of freedom in unique ways, but their messages areRead MoreTyranny And The Social Wellbeing Of Citizens1750 Words   |  7 Pages19th century, in the age after the French Revolution, the vast majority of political and philosophical thinkers concerned themselves at some point with the issue of tyranny in society. Such writers spanned from Alexis de Tocqueville, to John Stuart Mill, to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The interpretations and approaches taken to the subject of tyranny and how to protect against it, though, were as varied as the collection of authors who addressed it. From de Tocqueville’s stringent observationsRead MoreCritical Writing Assigment 41874 Words   |  8 Pageswhich leaned somewhat to laissez-faire economics, the interpretation of John Stuart Mill, which was complex and indecisive, and the interpretation of Karl Marx, which argued against the concept of a free marke t. The essay concludes by discussing the complexity of the debate and the unanswered questions it still presents to modern economists. Keywords: free market, free market system, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx Introduction The majority of classical economists based their workRead MoreAnalysis of New Ideas from Dead Economists Essay1261 Words   |  6 Pagesthe study of choice. Economists examine the consequences of the choices people make. The creation and evolution of economics over centuries came from the ideas of four economists: Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, Alfred Marshall and John Maynard Keynes. These well respected economists help the theory of economics grow and become what it is today. Economics started with the ideas of Adam Smith. He is credited as the first true economist. He had never taught

College Answers free essay sample

Good morning and welcome to all who have gathered here today! Ill try my best to avoid the Papa Keith speeches of Koki engineer aka cam garage, business mien Koki pan Anna garage Its kind of funny that we have got to bald farewell to this college today only to come back In a few days to give our visa and 8th seem exams. But then I guess we have to make do with what we have, and Im happy that I got a chance to speak to all my friends from college on this occasion I think that a farewell speech Is probably the ONLY speech where students actually sites to the speaker (well I am hoping at least that Is the case right now! Now that I have your undivided attention, let me share a few experiences I had during the past 4 years of my life in K. We will write a custom essay sample on College Answers or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page J Somalia Engineering. It was a scary feeling when all of us got in this college through the admission rounds at VISIT. When I came out of the inner hall with the confirmation slip in my hand I hardly knew anything about the college. It was chosen only for its proximity to my place. And what a decision it was in return for an engineering seat in an unknown college I got back innumerable friends and loads of good times.First Year Engineering must be THE most memorable year for any of the students out here. I think all of us would agree that the Symphony during our First Year -when Primary had been here was the best one we had. The best part about FEE was that the college management had not divided the students according to branches. This gave us a chance to interact with people from all the branches for one whole year. This helped a lot by keeping us acquainted, even when we were separated from the second year onwards. I can remember it clearly FEE classes in the old workshop building with temperatures