Privacy Concerns Essay -- Technology, DNA Databases

Privacy ConcernsMost studies have shown that popular opinion holds that without a doubt national DNA databases have proved useful in whitlow investigations (Wallace, 2006, pS27). The concept of a national DNA database has raised concern about privacy and human rights as seen through the scope of public safety. All of these concerns be elevated with databases include convicted, arrestee, innocent, and rehabilitated offenders (Suter, 2010, p339). Robin Williams of University of Duham (2006) asserts that The rapid implementation and continuing expansion of forensic DNA databases around the world has been supported by claims about their lastingness in criminal investigations and challenged by assertions of the resulting intrusiveness into individual privacy (p545).To determine the balance between privacy and public safety legislation must voice communication many questions including (but not limited to) when is a sample required to be obtained and by whom, is consent required, is forc e ever acceptable to obtain a sample, and which samples should be retained? Dr Katina Michael has reported that some instances that constitute acceptable DNA sample collection and storage (Table 4). The United States, England and Wales contain legislation that authorizes the collection of DNA from individuals arrested for violations of trustworthy federal criminal laws and inclusion into the national DNA database of all profiles. Primary concerns focus these legal authorizations address privacy of a person and legal calculate and seizures of biological samples. For many countries like the United States there is a need to enact special legislation which led to delays in the implementation of DNA databases (Goodwin, et al., 2007, p102). In the United Sta... ...data from law enforcement databases for those who receive acquittals or whose convictions are overturned there is no reference to physical DNA samples (Lwin, 2010, p21). Historically, legislative proposals purpose indefinite memory of evidentiary DNA samples, however the US, unlike England and Wales, does not refer to retention periods for genetic information post sentence completion. Individuals may find concern for individualized genetic identifiers if the physical sample is retained post sentence completion, acquittal or if found innocent (Congressional Research Service, 2010, pp13-14 Beiber, 2002, p14). Studies assert the method of sample collection, accreditation of agencies solicitation samples, legislative limits on retention periods for biometric information and a focus on balancing privacy and crime deterrence will structure a productive DNA database model.